Jermain Beckford

[dekiNS]

This guy is for free, so I don't see a reason why not to sign him, good player for free, there is nothing better
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 52,00.html

[roverzealous]

We don't have the money to compete for his signature.

[SheepShagginRover]

We don't have the money to compete for his signature.

Wage-wise? I dunnor perhaps we do. He wont be that dear.

[Rover the Top]

One reason not to sign him is, as the article says, Everton might sign him instead. Another would be that we may have better targets than a L1 striker, and don't want to waste wages on a player we're not actually interested in.

[roverzealous]

Even if we were interested, I doubt we could offer him higher wages than Everton could.

And anyway, who would you rather sign for, Everton or Rovers?

[mrblackbat]

If there's nothing better than Jermaine Beckford, then there's something wrong with football.

[Rover the Top]

And anyway, who would you rather sign for, Everton or Rovers?

Rovers, obviously. Silly question.

But from a non-supporter's point of view, it could depend on how much I valued team success, money, and first team football.

[roverzealous]

And anyway, who would you rather sign for, Everton or Rovers?

Rovers, obviously. Silly question.

But from a non-supporter's point of view, it could depend on how much I valued team success, money, and first team football.

There'd also be the choice of Moyes or Allardyce.

[RoverthePennines]

If there's nothing better than Jermaine Beckford, then there's something wrong with football.

ha

[dekiNS]

They could offer him a better salary but he knows that he wouldn't play much first team football in Everton as he could at Rovers, that a very important thing along with salary! So I think that we could try to sign him there's no doubt!!!

[SheepShagginRover]

[gareth386]

http://www.footballfancast.com/football ... n_Blogs%29